-----Original Message-----
From: b <rrdd3939@aol.com>
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Mon, Jul 11, 2011 2:46 pm
Subject: Fwd: Updated Anew: CHAIN LETTER of a NATURE DIFFERENT 1
From: b <rrdd3939@aol.com>
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Mon, Jul 11, 2011 2:46 pm
Subject: Fwd: Updated Anew: CHAIN LETTER of a NATURE DIFFERENT 1
Updated Anew: Chain Letter of a Nature Different 1
by Citizen Journalist and Richard DePersio
PREFACE: We have a crisis: NASA might have to put up a "Going-Out-of-Business"
sign soon unless WE do something about it soon! Chain Letter proper has been
updated. Please add the following:
Let's put things in their proper perspective...NASA is special and unique being the
only component of fed gov from which you actually get a return: for every $1 budgeted,
we get about $5 returned within approximately 7 years in the form of science and
technology. NASA is completely or partially responsible for over 30,000 discoveries
and inventions since its inception in 1958.
What can we do? Phone or leave a message at the website of members of
congress (info below). What should we say to the full-of-themselves? NASA receives
$17.5 billion annually or 1/2 of 1% of fed budget. Congress plans to cut NASA's
budget by $1 to 2 billion. We realize that everyone must do their share in debt crisis.
In light of NASA's uniqueness do you think that $500 million or about 2.5% of
NASA's budget is acceptable?
We understand that many Republicans and even a few Democrats object to
giving SpaceX and Virgin Galactic of $750 million apiece - a subsidy which won't
be reimbursed. Obama wants to allocate $2.5 billion for heavy-lifter and manned-
beyond-earth-orbit program which is woefully too small for goals to be met. NASA
may as well fold up its tent and lay-off even more workers during this recession
which Obama thinks is over! NASA won't be flying anywhere for another 30 or
more years! We concur with members of Congress (capital 'C' - we must be
polite when asking for money) who want NASA to have $4 billion and let private
sector fend for itself. Just say "No" to subsidies!
Sent: Sun, Jan 9, 2011 4:02 pm
Subject: CHAIN LETTER of a NATURE DIFFERENT 1 (LATEST UPDATE):
Sent: Sun, Jan 9, 2011 4:02 pm
Subject: CHAIN LETTER of a NATURE DIFFERENT 1 (LATEST UPDATE):
Update 1: Proposal 1 - Congratulations! House approved.
We aren't satisfied, we want it to be required in Senate too;
no more messing with our Constitution. All new bills must have
an attachment showing that the bill is constitutional.
Update 2: Proposal 2 - it appears as if the $9.5 billion spent on R & D in the
soon to be discontinued "Constellation" program won't go down the same
presidential black hole as $$$s for stimulus packages, cash-for-clunkers and
Fannie/Freddie! It will be used in new heavy-lift rocket program/man beyond
earth orbit program.
Reminder: Send all 11 "Action Chain Letters" to family members, friends and
co-workers. Or, take it a step further: phone and/or leave messages at websites
of members of congress. Congressional info: "Action Chain Letters" 1, 2 and 5.
NASA budget: $17.5 billion; planned cut: $1 billion. NASA will be
allocated $2.5 billion for heavy-lifter/beyond earth orbit program;
SpaceX and Virgin Galactic will receive subsidy of $750 million
each.
Sent: Sun, Nov 21, 2010 1:39 pm
Subject: CHAIN LETTER of a NATURE DIFFERENT 1:
Subject: CHAIN LETTER of a NATURE DIFFERENT 1:
CONSTITUTION and COSMOS
Subject: SAVING OUR CONSTITUTION
All Congressional legislation should come with a requisite attachment
showing the constitutionality of content. Update: House, yes; Senate, no.
Subject: A DIFFERENT and MEANINGFUL CHAIN LETTER
Your Cyber-Friend: Richard DePersio (letter at various
Your Cyber-Friend: Richard DePersio (letter at various
groups.google.com/group/rickcosmos-eclectic comsats and inspiration
at Facebook: Rickaddsite). Together, we can do it).