www.comsat-ak.blogspot.com

Wednesday, June 1, 2011

Fwd: "Action Chain Letters" Addendum 1

(Check out "NASA Song" at Jango by Vic)
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Thu, Feb 24, 2011 10:17 pm
Subject: "Action Chain Letters" Addendum 1

(Treasure Hunt: Be the first kid on your block to collect all 7 "Action Chain Letters."

You must visit: groups.google.com/group/nasa-our-way, /group/newfederalism and

/group/rickcosmos-eclectic Stale gum not included.

Sub-Title: What to do with $1.4 billion

NASA only receives one-half of 1% of federal budget: approximately $18 billion.

Obama wants to cut it by nearly $1 billion and compel NASA to spend about

20% of the budget - about 1.4 billion - on bogus climate change studies. NASA's

mandate: manned space flight; collateral benefits: to nearly all sciences (including,

real climatology) and technologies. One of the companies which builds Space

Shuttle and also helps NASA launch it wants to upgrade large external fuel

tank (we might get a two-fer: shuttle replacement might require it) and launch

2 or 3 shuttle missions per year until shuttle replacement (heavy-lifter/beyond

earth orbit flights; if Obama doesn't kill it)is ready for $1.4 billion a year (thereby,

avoiding U.S. from being grounded and having to pay Russia an

astronomically high price every time we want to put astro in orbit (how

humiliating! U.S. can still fly Russian once in awhile and vi ca versa. Complete

dependence - disgraceful!). Bearing in mind NASA's mandate: What choice

should congress make?

Obama wants NASA to work closely with China's nascent space program. Why

should we share our advanced technology with them. Further, he wants

Russia and U.S. to work closely on an ugly green intelligent grid: better to

sabotage us. China has super-computer faster then ours - courtesy of Billy-boy

Clinton.

Most house members below are leaning in our direction. Tell them what you

want. Encourage them.

Sent: Wed, Feb 23, 2011 8:34 pm
Subject: A WHOLE LOTTA STUFF with which to WORK

Friends of NASA in congress are talking about 'Sputnik Moment' when the U.S. forfeits lead in space exploration and missile defense, as well as, doesn't do what Russia and China are doing: relying heavily on their space programs to drive innovation and promote economic growth.

We have been saying it for years: restore NASA to preeminence of the 1960's

when it enjoyed a virtual 'blank check' as regards its budget for NASA is the

only part of fed gov which gives a return on the investment ($7 within 5 years
in the form of pure and applied science (spin-offs or applications - NASA in

your home, car, factory, farm, office, hospital, etc.).

We are cognizant of the fact that there must be massive spending cuts to

save our nation from third-world status and that everyone has their pet

project that they belief should be sparred the ax but can they make the

forgoing claim!?!

Are we going to allow this president to phase out NASA and during the process

shift NASA's priorities away from manned space exploration and the

technological advances derived - the engine of our economy.

By the Bye: February 15, 27 year old mother saved by hurt pump with parts

originally designed for manned spaceflight; Feb. 18, New York City sending S.O.S. to NASA - $2 billion upgrade of 911 system full of gremlins - - sometimes,

police and fire and ambulance sent to wrong location and response time

hasn't been reduced as much as had been hoped and expected.

Add to our list (on "Action Chain Letters" to be found here and groups.

google.com/rickcosmos-eclectic and /group/newfederalism):

Chairman, House Appropriations Committee (www.)Rogers.house.gov/public

Chairman, Sub-Committee on Commerce-Justice-Science (what a combo!

Maybe, congress needs an expect on organization): Wolf.

From all over the country and all in the House: Posey, Culberson, Aderholt,

Rohrabacher, Bishop and Chaffetz. Leave message, give them a piece of

your mind, can't you spare it?

To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Mon, Jan 24, 2011 8:55 am
Subject: CONSTELLATION and SUN RISE

at groups.google.com/group/nasa-our-way...

Unorthodox "Action Chain Letters 1 - 7" on NASA, Economics, Government,

Education and Constitution form core of our SECOND AMERICAN REVOLUTION!

We hope that you will join us and act on the proposals which most energize and

motivate you. Written during the last quarter of 2010, they are meant to be used

until the end of 2011; will be updated when circumstances warrant.

Cyber-Friends, will Decide...
if Rick goes out with a BIG BANG. How many visits will his comsats (websites)

receive in his closing days according to Google- and AddThis-Analytics. Wen, Jan 16 and 19, 2011 Updates for "Citizen Journalist Exclusive: A Bad Case of

Treason" and "Action Chain Letter 6," perhaps, the most controversial 'letter' updated at groups.google.com/group/newfederalism Please read, then click for text... Sun, Jan 16, 2011 3:00 pm New "CHAIN LETTERS OF A NATURE UNORTHODOX 2 & 1 DIGESTED" at groups.google.com/nasa-our-way Read updates, click for text... Thu, Jan 13, 2011 2:40 pm Subject: LETTER SENT ACROSS POND... "CITIZEN JOURNALIST REPOrTS" at www.rickaddsite.blogspot.com If you see a gremlin: www.quasarpolitics.blogspot.com and groups. google.com/group/rickcosmos-eclectic We are in the process of troubleshooting.Regret any inconvenience; feedback welcomed. (continued)...

Subject: MONDAY'S with RICK" EXPANDED...                               Wen, Jan 12, 2011 11 pm                                         SECOND HALF EVEN BETTER THEN FIRST (modesty aside) One of his best:  In the Hood and Farewell to Keynes at  rickaddsite and www.quasarpolitics.blogspot.com  __continued)...  "Space Shuttle Spin-offs" at rickaddsite. One more thing: Please read older posts at all comsats - we worked hard on them; not out-of-date - we swear to NASA!  ___________________________________________________________

Fwd: CHAIN LETTERS OF A NATURE UNORTHODOX 2 & 1 DIGESTED

-----Original Message-----
From: Rickcosmos rrdd3939@aol.com

Sent: Mon, Feb 7, 2011 1:38 pm
Subject: Re: Fwd: CHAIN LETTERS OF A NATURE UNORTHODOX 2 & 1 DIGESTED

Another update: GREAT NEWS! Main Space Shuttle contractor wants to fly two shuttle flights per year with new external fuel tank beginning in 2013. SpaceX won't begin cargo flights for 2 or more years and manned flights for 4 or more. Humiliation: being dependent on their schedule and paying them a hefty price to fly our astros for 4 years when we beat them in Moon Race - Russia. Two birds with one stone: we already told you in an update here that NASA is considering a new heavy-lifter/beyond earth-orbit explorer with a large external fuel tank.  On Jan 17, 4:45 pm, Rickcosmos <rrdd3...@aol.com> wrote: > CHAIN LETTERS OF A NATURE UNORTHODOX 2 & 1 DIGESTED: Return land > stolen from the states > by fed gov and end all subsidies except under extraordinarily > circumstances, otherwise, let free-market > forces operate (details in forthcoming chain letter, also see: "She > Only had Time for a Short One - > Part Two." > > On Jan 16, 3:56 pm, b <rrdd3...@aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: b <rrdd3...@aol.com> > > To: rrdd3...@aol.com > > Sent: Sun, Jan 16, 2011 3:47 pm > > Subject: CHAIN LETTERS OF A NATURE UNORTHODOX 2 & 1 DIGESTED > > > PREFACE (A preface to a letter, can he do that? He's doing it): It is > > our fervent hope that you will read all seven "Action Chain Letters" > > (must visit this site - you are here! -  /group/rickcosmos-eclectic and > > /group/newfederalism in order to collect all seven) and > > that you will seriously consider working on the proposals with which > > you agree during 2011. Please share chain letters with family, friends > > and co-workers. (Sympathy Card: disabled and homebound; will do > > anything for > > what we call "The Second American Revolution" - even exploitation of > > the Self). > > Proposal 1: > > All congressional legislation should come with a requisite attachment > > showing the constitutionality of content. (Reason: Self-evident). > > Update: > > We won this in House; we should work for it in Senate. > > Proposal 2: > > We've spent $9.5 billion on "Constellation" Program R & D. It should > > not be allowed to go down same presidential black hole as > > "Cash-for-Clunkers," the stimulus packages and Fannie/Freddie! As much > > of it as                              possible should be incorporated > > into the plans, which our underdevelopment, for a new > > manned spacecraft, earth-mars transfer module, new heavy-lifting rocket. > > Update: > > It would appear as if there is a 50/50 chance that this will not come > > to pass; not good enough - more work strongly indicated. > > > NASA receives only one half of 1% of federal budget. It is a unique > > government program - you actually get a return on your investment! > > There is a $7 return within about a 5 year period for every $1 it is > > budgeted in the > > form of pure science (increasing man's knowledge which is good in > > itself but > > also has potential of becoming applied science or technology) and > > spin-offs/applications (technology: NASA in your home, car, factory, > > farm, office, hospital; > > NASA all around you and you are largely oblivious to the fact). > > We say "yes" to private/commercial space programs and "no" to taxpayers > > subsidizing it. We're not going to share in the dividends (for more > > info see: "Where are My Dividends" at /group/nasa-our-way and "Do You > > Think..." at > > /group/newfederalism, as well as, "Action Chain Letter: 4."). All > > subsidies are socialistic and unconstitutional and should be phased-out > > over a three to ten                        year period (depending on > > the program), especially, in light of the fact > > that we face the possibility of our nation losing its Triple 'A' Bond > > Rating within 4 > > years and becoming a third-world nation within 20 years if we don't get > > serious about                               cutting government spending. > > We are giving in the form of a subsidy (no pay back) $3.5 billion to > > SpaceX's Falcon 9 program and $1 billion to (the wealthy owner of) > > Virgin Galactic. > > SpaceX is already $900 million over budget! (Were they penalized? No; > > they were given an additional $900 million! Who wanted to subsidize? > > The constitutional                       criminal himself: Obama; by > > our count: 14 constitutional infractions thus far). > > This money should have been invested in that unique government program > > - part of which > > would have prevented the massive lay-offs (at NASA and the companies > > that contract with > > NASA; no subsidy here - contract) during a recession. It is imperative > > that NASA > > is restored to being the scientific/technological engine of the economy > > at the level it > > enjoyed, 1958-73. > > > Please consider phoning and/or leaving a message at the website of > > members of Congress. You might want to start with your two U.S. > > senators and one > > congressman. Phone 202-224-3121 to find out their names (you must know > > the name of > > the state in which you live!) or the name of the chairman or ranking > > member of a > > particular sub-committee or committee.You might want to venture outside > > of your state. Somesuggestions: (www.)shelby.senate.gov/publicand  202-224-5744;(www.)ryan.senate.gov/public/;Senator Rubio; House  members:(www.)conrad.house.                       gov/public/, Greg, Bishop, > > Wolf. Contact then as regards any proposal; added bonus:                 > >             most are members of committees > > and/or sub-committees relating to NASA). > > > Please check out: YouTube: Rickaddsite andwww.rickaddsite.blogspot.com > > for more information. Let's do ourselves a "SECOND AMERICAN > > REVOLUTION"!!!

Fwd: UNIQUE and SPECIAL CHAIN LETTER 3:

-----Original Message-----
From: b <rrdd3939@aol.com>
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Sun, Nov 21, 2010 4:17 pm
Subject: UNIQUE and SPECIAL CHAIN LETTER 3:

CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION and X-37B

PROPOSAL 5:

CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION: We should phone and/or leave a message at the website

of our governor and state legislators demanding that they call for a Constitutional Convention

aka Article 5 Convention to which they would appoint delegates. It would require 34 states to call for a convention. Proposed amendments have to be approved by 38 states or by 38 pairs

of delegates at the convention. In the past, the possibility of a convention has prompted

congress to act by passing amendments via the other method: approval of over two-thirds

of both houses of congress, thereby, enabling congress to control the amendment process

but being compelled to take into account the wishes of the states. We should demand

Constitutional Convention and no usurping by congress.

PROPOSAL 6:

COMMERCE CLAUSE: Said convention should propose an amendment reiterating the real

definition of the clause predicated on the Constitution and the Federalist Papers. Primarily

between 1905-21, 1933-46, 1963-72 and 2009-present, congress has invoked "Commerce

Clause" for non-commerce or intra-state commerce matters. This is also true of many

presidential executive orders, executive branch regulations and judicial decisions. These

constitute unconstitutional acts for he U.S. Constitution only gives congress authority in 16

areas. This is why, we don't won't congress too involved with amendment process. They

would not be inclined to forfeit powers unconstitutionally seized.

PROPOSAL 7:

CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION-PLUS: Delegates or committees appointed by delegates

should list laws, orders, regs, decisions rendered that are in violation and decide or

recommend if act should be retained or modified or replaced or deemed null-and-void

and not be replaced (Citizens are victims of too many laws and regs infringing on our

liberties!). They must then frame in the form of an omnibus amendment. This action

might provoke a Constitutional Crisis with Congress claiming Constitutional Convention

exceeding mandate while states harbor the view that such action would serve to define

Nullification Doctrine.

PROPOSAL 8:

AMENDMENT 17: Revoke it. Superficially, it appears to have empowered the citizenry

but further probing indicates otherwise and, further, violates intent of Founding Father's.

Their Master Plan: Voters would directly elect members of state legislators and members

of House of Representatives who, therefore, would strongly fight to defend state powers

and citizen's rights in the case of the former and citizen's rights in the case of the latter.

State legislators would choose electors (now, voters choose electors) who, in turn, would

choose president. The president would, in effect, be 3 steps (now, 2) removed from the

voters and would be inclined to fight for a big and powerful fed gov to carry out the 16

responsibilities of fed gov. Each house of a state legislature would choose a U.S.

Senator. During the first 'progressive era or error' in 1913, voters would henceforth

choose U.S. Senators. Good idea; power to the people. Wrong!!! Bad idea. Under

original system a senator's desire to empower fed gov would be held in check by the

strings attached to him by state legislators (who are interested in state powers {first} and

citizen's rights {second}). Example: Major Healthcare Reform giving fed gov control

over an additional 17% of economy and shrinking state authority and citizen's rights in

the realm of healthcare with this humongous bill. Senators would fear that state

legislators wouldn't extend their contracts for another 6 years when their terms expired

and might pressure them to resign or recall them. The Founding Fathers gave birth to

an ingenious plan which progressives (later known as liberals) had the audacity to mess

with and weaken not empowered us. There's an old army saying: "If it ain't broke, don't

fix it!"Further, the nature of the beast - healthcare reform - - it is so large that it should

have necessitated a Constitutional Amendment. Instead it was shoved through - with

members of congress not reading bill indirectly written by president george soros - on

a simple majority vote bypassing 60-vote Senate approval (filibuster).

PROPOSAL 9:

X-37B to CONSTITUTION: Last year, Obama signed a directive enabling greater overt cooperation between military and NASA (one thumb's up for Obama). Let's exercise it

to prevent Obama from destroying NASA. This year the Air Force orbited for one month

the X-37B unmanned 'secret' (launch was televised live) which presently resembles a

one-third sized version of Space Shuttle. It is suspected to have carried equipment in

it's cargo bay for testing (equipment that might be deployed as part of future military

satellites). It was landed by remote control. How many orbital test flights were conducted

in the past? We are in the dark. It would appear close to being operational and appear to

have an appearance similar to final version. The operational craft should be called

CONSTITUTION in order to drive liberals who don't believe in the real Constitution but

the bogus "progressive 'living' constitution" crazy! At least one declassified version

should be put on loan to NASA so that NASA can develop it to bring cargo to the

International (our - we paid bulk of cost) Space Station decreasing our future dependence

on Russia (we have a plan to prevent costly dependence entirely - see previous two chain

letters and articles at www.rickaddsite.blogspot.com and rickscisite.blogspot.com and

groups.google.com/group/nasa-our-way).

WHAT is at STAKE? OUR LIBERTY and ONE of OUR MAIN SCIENTIFIC/TECHNOLOGICAL ENGINES of OUR ECONOMY.