Discover Favorites Stumblers | ||
| ||
|
Saturday, June 26, 2010
Check out this site I found on StumbleUpon!
Sunday, June 20, 2010
Fwd: Signature in the Cell by Stephen C. Meyer
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Sun, Jun 20, 2010 7:04 pm
Subject: Signature in the Cell by Stephen C. Meyer
Our background is in science. What if no dark energy? What becomes of inflationary
http://www.signatureinthecell.com/ --- This message was sent by rrdd3939@aol.com via http://addthis.com. Please note that AddThis does not verify email addresses. Make sharing easier with the AddThis Toolbar: http://www.addthis.com/go/toolbar-em
Thursday, May 13, 2010
Fwd: MISSION STATEMENT FOR "COSMIC TRINITY w/NASA associate component
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Thu, May 13, 2010 9:47 pm
Subject: MISSION STATEMENT FOR "COSMIC TRINITY" w/NASA associate component
Saturday, May 8, 2010
comsat-ak.blogspot.com visits walterjacobsonmd.wordpress.wordpress.com
Project
VISITING
Tuesday, May 4, 2010
Monday, May 3, 2010
Thursday, April 29, 2010
The Long Countdown - The Fight Over NASA’s Future - NYTimes.com
---
This message was sent by rrdd3939@aol.com via http://addthis.com. Please note that AddThis does not verify email addresses.
Make sharing easier with the AddThis Toolbar: http://www.addthis.com/go/toolbar-em
Monday, April 12, 2010
Fwd: Mind vs Body: What I Think Is What I Am
From: Walter Jacobson <walterdoc@mac.com>
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Sun, Apr 4, 2010 1:57 pm
Subject: Mind vs Body: What I Think Is What I Am
Tuesday, April 6, 2010
Fwd: MUSINGS and EDITOR'S NOTE and COMING SOON
OUR READERS WILL CONTRIBUTE OBSERVATIONS, STATEMENTS AND
ARTICLES (rrdd3939@aol.com).
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Tue, Mar 2, 2010 5:43 pm
Subject: MUSINGS and EDITOR'S NOTE and COMING SOON
NASA.gov - Top Story - NEW IMAGE OF INFANT UNIVERSE REVEALS ERA OF FIRST STARS, AGE OF COSMOS, AND MORE - Feb. 11, 2003
Personal Message:
Richard DePersio. Light There be Light. This represents the first visible
light created in the universe. Red light is visible. Beyond the red is
infrared followed by microwave (nearest part of radio portion of the
electromagnetic spectrum). 3 degree kelvin radiation is in the microwave
and surrounds the whole universe. The burst of bright and blinding light
occurred about 400,000 years after the big bang. Since then the universe
has continued to expand and cool.
Top Story - NEW IMAGE OF INFANT UNIVERSE REVEALS ERA OF FIRST STARS, AGE OF COSMOS, AND MORE - Feb. 11, 2003
Related Links For more information contact: Nancy Neal NASA Headquarters Washington, DC (Phone: 202/358-2369) Bill Steigerwald Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Md. (Phone: 301/286-5017) MAP Glossary (PDF File) MAP Primer (PDF File) You must have Acrobat Reader (a free download) to view the files above.
Click the following to access the link:
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/topstory/2003/0206mapresults.html
****************************
NASA Privacy Statement:
http://www.nasa.gov/about/highlights/HP_Privacy.html
Monday, April 5, 2010
NASA.gov - The First Communications Satellite
Personal Message:
OUR FIRST COMMUNICATION SATELLITE
The First Communications Satellite
Click the following to access the link:
http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_559.html
****************************
NASA Privacy Statement:
http://www.nasa.gov/about/highlights/HP_Privacy.html
Fwd: PLATO'S MAN IN A CAVE - NEW VERSION
EDITOR'S NOTE: Doc's psychological twist
Our common sense world might be a corruption of reality. Reality might exist in thebizarre quantum world and ultimate reality in the stranger quantum/relativity world - if we can find it! Plato with one foot in this world and the other on a higher plane - sohe thought. Will we have to except it as well. (Brain singular or) Brain/Mind two sidesof same coin. Complete each other. Will we need to have one foot in this world and theother in the quantum/relativity world.=
Walter E Jacobson, MD
Psychiatrist, Speaker & Author.
Spiritual Solutions & Cognitive Tools for Happiness, Well-Being &
Material Success.
Subscribe to my blog: http://walterjacobsonmd.wordpress.com
Join me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/walterdoc
Join me on Facebook:
www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1477197255&ref=profile#
Join me on LinkedIn:
http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=27562995&locale=en_US&t
rk=tab_pro
Psychiatrist, Speaker & Author.
Spiritual Solutions & Cognitive Tools for Happiness, Well-Being &
Material Success.
Subscribe to my blog: http://walterjacobsonmd.wordpress.com
Join me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/walterdoc
Join me on Facebook:
www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1477197255&ref=profile#
Join me on LinkedIn:
http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=27562995&locale=en_US&t
rk=tab_pro
Fwd: WHAT'S BETWEEN MY EARS?
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To: rrdd3939.sunspots@blogger.com
Sent: Sun, Feb 14, 2010 10:17 pm
Subject: Fwd: WHAT'S BETWEEN MY EARS?
-----Original Message-----
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To:
Sent: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 8:35 pm
Subject: WHAT'S BETWEEN MY EARS?
Don't worry about paying your rent: the liberal/secular media's messiah has arrived. Actually. I wish him the best - he is my president and Bush left him a financial mess. The liberal biased media doesn't want you to know that Billy-boy Clinton made it possible for individuals with little or no credit to get mortgages through Fanny and Freddy! President Bush thought that it was good idea to allow low income people to have the opportunity to own a house until 2005 when he realized that the policy Clinton implemented '98 had gone too far. He tried through executive decisions in 2005 to rectify the situation to no avail. He directed republican leaders to raise the issue with the chairman of the Senate Banking and Finance Committee, Barney 'is my skirt to short' Frank. He was told that there was a housing problem that could turn into a crisis. He refused to take any action and claimed that the republicans were making things up He was on watch and there
were no problems. And then came the domino effect: the mortgage domino fell leading to the fall of investment and commercial bank and wall street dominos. By the way, he. Oboma and other democrats were receiving campaign contributions - some for many years - from Fanny mae and Freddy Mac - - - both of which are semi-independent federal agencies. Possible crime here. Do you think the democrats will investigate their own. They and their liberals cohorts in the mainstream media will continue to blame Bush. You should spend some time thinking about the big, profound, cosmic questions before they place you six feet under. As for the democrats in congress - they were born with strong liberal genes...
The mind-body problem: Sociobiology; Tabula Rasa and Saving Self.
At least they don't tell me when to speak or go skydiving: Or, do they?!
Physicalists are philosophers who like most computer scientists, evolutionary psychologists and neuro-scientists harbor the view that the mind is physical and that mental states are neurological states or properties. And most of them subscribe to the sociobiological perspective regarding mind: intelligence; consciousness; thought; perception; memory; emotion; will; imagination; unconsciousness; personality; behavior.There's more in your genes then you think! Neurons are the brains nerve cells and cells contain genes. You can be born with a strong homosexual gene and therefore are likely to grow-up to be Barneyy Franks. They can't help being what they are anymore then you can, as a result, their life style should be excepted as normal
and condoned by society and recognized by government. (They aren't immoral -Bible; they aren't abnormal - traditional biology). You can be born with a strong criminal gene. Consequently,criminals shouldn't be severely punished they just couldn't help but shoot that guy. As Ann Courtler points out in her book, The church of liberalism:
" Why is it that liberals say that child molesters shouldn't be imprisoned but should receive psychotherapy instead. Weren't they born with a strong child molester gene? They can be helped but homosexuals can't. (I paraphrased somewhat). You can even be born with a strong nasty gene or a strong greedy gene - you got the idea. You programmed like a computer!
Some say that it's part nature(genes) and part nurture (environment). I don't find this argument palatable. X was born with a strong nasty gene and Y a weak nasty gene. What determines whether or not he will grow up to be nasty? They should just drop nature from the equation.
Their strongest argument: twins separated at birth have a 50% chance to grow up to have a similar personality and background. I don' find their argument compelling.
Bible: man has free will; traditional biology: human's have the most advanced brains and therefor aren'tslaves of their biology.
Tabula Rasa. Ibn Sina, Persian philosopher in the 11th century, "human intellect at birth is rather like a tabula rasa (blank slate), a pure potentiality that is actualized through education and that knowledge is attained through empirical familiarity with objects in this world from which gains abstract, universal conceptswhich is developed through reason ; observations lead to propositional statements which when compounded lead to further abstract concepts." The theory - originally proposed by Aristotle - has gone virtually unchanged.
Clearly, psychosis are the result of genes or structural brain structure damage. The meaning of facial expressions made by infants are universal.
Saving Self: at this juncture, we can all agree that genes determine hair texture, eye color,
congenital and hereditary disease, etc. There can be environmental constraints on realization. Genes might indicate that an individual will be tall and muscular due to lack of food or sanitary conditions or other factors in which the individual inhabits this might not come to pass. Biological characteristics,
Supporters of dualism maintain that mental phenomena are in some respects non-physical. They hold the view that phenomena may be perceived through a person's senses or with the mind and the mind doesn't exist in non-living things. Mind is subjective and isn't spatial (height, length, width) like brain or brick. Some dualist go so far as to suggest that mind and brain are properties of an unknown substance.
Let's put all are cards on the table...The average man is much taller and stronger then the average woman; male and female chromosomal differences; women tend to be left-hemisphered (cerebral cortex) while Rick prefers the right (in more ways then one).
Let's make some assumptions: intellect and reason (the higher functions partially genetic-jury still out). John Pokinhorn, physicist and priest (how's that for a combo!) states, "reductionist - replicating, information processing, and existing is all that they think that we do!"
We take in data through our senses and neurons light up as a result of the input while other neurons light up to generate a response. Memories are held in neurons and neural connections. Our mind can light up neurons in dreaming, day-dreaming and when engaging jn abstract thought without sensory input. matter and energy are two forms of the same thing as are particles and waves.
You see the sky and the pond floor when you look into a pond. Some photons of light bounce off of the water a strike your eyes while others bounce off of the pond floor. Quantum physics isn't deterministic. It can only talk in terms of probabilities. The probability of weather a particular photon will bounce off the water or floor. Is the photon thinking? no, energy can't think.
What is mind? A phenomenon that accompanies another phenomenon is usually parallel to it and is related in some way to it - precise electric correlates of conscious things in the human brain. Option one: mind and brain are different forms of the same thing; option two: mind fills out, completes, compliments brain; mind is made up of a mysterious unknown substance.
I'm going with option one and two: the abstract, imaginations, dreams, will and emotions, complete brain. It isn't genetic. Husband and wife complete each other; wave and particle complete each other; matter and energy complete each other or are different forms of same thing.. There different manifestations of the same thing and interact with each other.
I was born with a strong conservative gene. Issue two: the science-politics problem. Was this a political or science article? With a nod toward Mozart, Einstein and Edison...
My A.D.D. Self,
Rick
Fwd: addendum
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To: rrdd3939.sunspots@blogger.com
Sent: Sun, Feb 14, 2010 10:11 pm
Subject: Fwd: addendum
-----Original Message-----
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To:
Sent: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 9:06 pm
Subject: addendum
ally your parents. Genetics is too simple in comparison.